Throughout my exploration of conceptual
art, music, and literature this semester, the concept of unboring boring
introduced by Kenneth Goldsmith has transcended different mediums and resonated
in everything we have studied. Unboring boring can be seen in Goldsmith’s
work when he uses process and procedure to take the mundane to a different
level. Another creator of conceptual
work that touches on the principles of unboring boring is Andy Warhol. In the ‘60s, Andy Warhol was part of the Pop
art movement. He took inspiration from
existing items or images and transformed them into colorful, stylized, and
unique works of art. Both Goldsmith and
Warhol use existing material from the world around them to create conceptual
literature and art. In his piece entitled
“Day,” Goldsmith turns an unexceptional household item, the daily newspaper,
into a 900 page book by simply transcribing every word. The change
of context of the newspaper alters the work without modifying the
text. In an analogous example, Andy Warhol elevates simple items
such as soup cans past their ordinary aesthetic appeal as he transforms
everyday images into art. In their original form, newspapers and
cans of soup are boring boring, but when the context changes to that of a gallery
or a book, the soup cans and newspapers become unboring boring.
While both Goldsmith and Warhol are
viewed as leaders and prominent figures in their respective conceptual
movements, not all their work was eagerly accepted at first. One of Warhol’s most famous paintings is an
image of Marilyn Monroe that he altered with bright colors in his distinctive
pop art, comic book-like technique. The vast majority of viewers of
the painting would not hesitate to accept the image as a unique, creative work
of art by Warhol. However when Warhol first made his Campbell’s soup
can paintings, other artists and critics mocked him. So why are
people willing to accept some of his paintings whole-heartedly and dismiss
others as plagiarism? A stylized portrait of Marilyn Monroe is not
that different from a stylized illustration of a Coca Cola bottle or a soup
can. The essence of Warhol’s work is elevating the ordinary world
surrounding us to an imaginative, colorful, and playful world that exists in
Warhol’s head. In “Popism: The Warhol ‘60s,” Andy Warhol said,
"Once you 'got' Pop, you could never see a sign the same way again. And
once you ‘thought’ Pop, you could never see America the same way
again." This quote shows the similarities between Warhol’s view
of pop art and Goldsmith’s context over content paradigm. In
Warhol’s pop art ‘thought,’ everything is art. Goldsmith views all
existing pieces of text in the same way. However the process of
recontextualization that Warhol and Goldsmith share, raises concern amongst
some people who encounter their work. Can works like “Day” and
Warhol’s soup paintings be considered unique works of art, or does the
uncreative method used make these pieces nothing more than celebrated
plagiarism?
This question is one that Goldsmith has
faced with every piece of text he has ever worked with. At a book
reading, Goldsmith was approached by another author who said, “You didn’t write
a word of what you read.” In his piece “Being Boring,” Goldsmith
acknowledges that in a traditional sense of what it means to be a writer, he
did not write the piece himself. But he goes on to explain that in
the “expanded field of appropriation, uncreativity, sampling, and language
management in which we all habit today,” the accusing author was wrong. As
writing and art and other forms of expression change with society, people need
to accept the new and sometimes crazy results of the shift. Despite initial opposition to their works,
both Andy Warhol and Kenneth Goldsmith are respected as artists and leaders of
their movements. Warhol took the ‘60s by storm with his bright pop
art and Goldsmith has extended the world of conceptual and found
poetry. Both artists use the ordinary and sometimes mundane world
around them to create interesting and ‘unboring’ works of art and literature.


No comments:
Post a Comment